The ‘Global South’ is a pernicious term that needs to be retired

Arbitrarily dividing a complex world into simple blocs creates polarisation and retards progress

The term is used to describe countries ranging from least developed to middle-income giants such as the Brics, but it is contradictory and anything but neutral, says the writer. PHOTO: AFP
New: Gift this subscriber-only story to your friends and family

It is quite an achievement for an expression to be patronising, factually inaccurate, a contradiction in terms and a catalyst for political polarisation all within two words, but the deeply unhelpful term “Global South” manages it with aplomb.

The expression apparently has its modern roots in postcolonial discourse, particularly in writings by the US activist Carl Oglesby about the Vietnam War. But in recent years it has been elevated into a descriptor for all lower-income nations, from the poorest “least developed countries” to the middle-income giants such as the Brics – some of which, specifically China and Russia, have extensive historical and indeed present-day imperialist traditions of their own.

Already a subscriber? 

Read the full story and more at $9.90/month

Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month

Unlock these benefits

  • All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com

  • Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device

  • E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.