Musk decries Australian court’s ‘censorship’ of X church stabbing posts

Mr Anthony Albanese said social media must have social responsibility but Elon Musk was fighting to keep violent content on his platform. PHOTO: REUTERS

SYDNEY - Billionaire Elon Musk lashed out at Australia’s prime minister on April 23 after a court ordered his social media company X to take down footage of an alleged terrorist attack in Sydney, saying the ruling meant any country could control “the entire internet”.

At a hearing overnight, Australia’s Federal Court ordered X, formerly called Twitter, to temporarily hide posts showing a video of the incident a week earlier, in which a teenager was charged with terrorism for knifing an Assyrian priest and others.

X said it had already blocked the posts from Australian users, but Australia’s e-Safety Commissioner said the content should be taken down since it showed explicit violence.

“Does the PM think he should have jurisdiction over all of earth?” Mr Musk wrote in a post, referring to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

The billionaire, who bought X in 2022 with a declared mission to save free speech, posted a meme on the platform that showed X stood for “free speech and truth”, while other social media platforms represented “censorship and propaganda”.

Mr Musk also wrote that “if ANY country is allowed to censor content for ALL countries, which is what the Australian ‘eSafety Commissar’ is demanding, then what is to stop any country from controlling the entire internet?”

The pushback by the world’s third-richest person sets up a new front in the battle between the world’s largest internet platforms and countries and non-profits seeking more oversight of the content hosted on them.

In March, a US judge threw out a lawsuit by X against the hate speech watchdog Centre for Countering Digital Hate.

In Australia, the e-Safety Commissioner fined X A$610,500 (S$537,000) in 2023 for failing to cooperate with a probe on anti-child abuse practices. X is fighting that penalty in court.

Mr Albanese on April 23 hit out at Mr Musk, calling him an “arrogant billionaire” for pushing back against the Australian government’s calls to take down the content.

“The idea that someone would go to court for the right to put up violent content on a platform shows how out-of-touch Mr Musk is,” Mr Albanese told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

Ms Julie Inman Grant, a spokeswoman for the e-Safety Commissioner, said the takedown notice was for the attack footage only, and not for “commentary, public debate or other posts about this event, even those which may link to extreme violent content”.

“While it may be difficult to eradicate damaging content from the internet entirely, e-Safety requires platforms to do everything practical and reasonable to minimise the harm it may cause to Australians and the Australian community,” she said.

Remote video URL

Although Mr Musk wrote in another post that X “blocked the content in question for Australian IP addresses”, the video could be seen on the platform by a Reuters journalist in Australia. A far-right senator also reposted the video on his X account.

Videos of the attack posted online showed the attacker, restrained by the congregation, shouting at the bishop for insulting Islam. Police have charged a 16-year-old with a terrorism offence over the attack.

The regulator had asked X to remove certain posts that publicly commented on the attack, which could include videos.

Judge Geoffrey Kennett, in an after-hours hearing, ordered X to block access to the posts until the afternoon of April 24, court documents showed. The matter will be considered again on that day.

Ms Alice Dawkins, executive director of internet policy non-profit Reset.Tech Australia, said Mr Musk’s comments fit “the company’s chaotic and negligent approach to the most basic user safety considerations that under previous leadership, the platform used to take seriously”. REUTERS

Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.